Skip to main content

School for dogs, humans & other species

Award category
Reconnecting with nature
You want to submit
NEW EUROPEAN BAUHAUS AWARDS: existing completed examples
Project title
School for dogs, humans & other species
Full project title
School for dogs, humans and other species. Educan

Educan is an educational multi-species architecture where dogs, humans and other species coexist and learn together, and where non-humans are at the centre of the design. 

Sitting in amongst fields, in a rural environment transformed over recent decades, Educan school is trialling ways to recover the conditions of the ecosystem. Educan is also an experiment that demonstrates that agricultural architectures can also be places of exploration, innovation, circularity, sustainability and beauty.

What was the geographical scope of your project?
Comunidad de Madrid
Does your project address mainly urban or rural issues?
It addresses urban-rural linkages
Does your project refer to a physical transformation of the built environment or other types of transformations?
It refers to a physical transformation of the built environment ('hard investment')
Has your project benefited from EU programmes or funds?
Has your project won an EU prize?
Your project is fully completed?
When was your project implemented?
How did you hear about the New European Bauhaus Prizes ?
Social media
On whose behalf are you submitting the application?
As an individual in partnership with other persons
Please provide a summary of your project

Eva, Carlos, two malinois – Bicho and Bomba –, one barn-owl, five swift families, six kestrel families and twenty sparrows, are all companion species. They live and learn together in this building, twenty miles west of Madrid. Sitting in amongst fields, in a rural environment transformed over recent decades by urban development and intensive pesticide-reliant agriculture, Educan School is trialling ways to recover the conditions of the ecosystem.

Its architecture is a multi-species design. While the two main classrooms are busy with dog–human pairs practising agility, birds nest on the upper floor’s nest-facade. Small birds of prey feed on rodents, maintaining a balance with local flora. Non-humans are at the centre of the design. The floors, usually designed for people in shoes, are adapted to the pads of canine paws: the training classrooms use removable rolls of dog-approved turf. Interior openings are raised to heights of more than one meter to avoid doggy distractions; louvred window shutters shade the south facade. Outside, the rainwater from the roof is harvested in large troughs for dogs and birds. Spoken word turns bark, and the interior surfaces are clad with sound-absorbing pyramid foam insulation, minimising noises and reverberation.

Material crossovers are explored in the building, combining different building techniques, trades and production systems: from material ecology or waste reduction with the reuse of shipping containers, to the hand-crafted ironwork; from automated air conditioning systems to manual bioclimatic control elements; from the material weight of the concrete walls to the lightness of the rest of the dry-assembled elements.

Educan is also an experiment that demonstrates that agricultural architectures, usually considered lesser within the discipline itself, can also be places of exploration and architectural innovation, where sustainability means circularity, low ecological footprint, ecological recovery or pedagogy and mediation.

Please indicate the main themes of your project with 5 key words
Multi-species architecture
Ecosystemic design
Rural recovering
Architectural innovation
Please give information about the key objectives of your project in terms of sustainability (including circularity) and how these have been met.
Please highlight how the project can be exemplary in this context

Sustainability and typology: The first revelant condition of this building as sustainable architecture is its typological singularity. Compared to low-quality industrial architectures commonly built in the sector, Educan is an innovative typology that combines prefabrication strategies with good quality materials, following an approach of economy of resources and the minimum ecological footprint.

Sustainability and territory: A second condition has to do with aspects of sustainability that tend to fall outside orthodox standards and evaluation parameters. Can a building collaborate to restore deteriorated environmental conditions in its territory? Educan is a center that mediates between territory (urban and rural), local fauna and flora, helping to recover an altered ecosystem.

Sustainability, materiality and circularity: The third strategy implemented in Educan addresses an ecological approach to materiality including the use of nearby products and labor (zero kilometer). In addition, the use of six 40'HQ maritime containers has made the reuse of 24,000 kg of steel possible. This fact is equivalent to 8,600 kg of CO2 and 3,600 m3 of water saved. The containers make up the roof of the building, but their remnants have also made possible to form and build the concrete wall on the ground floor.

Sustainability, efficiency energy use and conservation of natural resources: The building has been designed developing several strategies such as high insulation, low consumption and bioclimatic approaches, which have allowed it to obtain a class A energy rating. The design proposes as well an energetic autonomy through photovoltaic solar panels in an upcoming  phase of the building. It is also relevant the collection and use of rain water, including the rainwater collected from the roof that fills in the two multispecies drinking fountains for dogs and birds.

Educan can be exemplary as it shows how design can contribute to taking care of our environment. 

Please give information about the key objectives of your project in terms of aesthetics and quality of experience beyond functionality and how these have been met.
Please highlight how the project can be exemplary in this context

Educan is an architectural experiment in which design and aesthetics are an intrinsic part related to the concept and spirit of the project. Functionally appropriate materials were sought for the needs (cleanliness, resistance, etc.), taking special care to the requirements of a design focus on animals (for example, with the floor specially approved for canine use). The colors and textures propose balance and make friendly the industrial character of the building and its materials. This aesthetic quality of the building has been recognized in various national and international awards (listed below). 

An important issue in the building was the quality of the experience through holistic comfort: comfort from an environmental perspective, through installations and tactics to achieve a pleasant temperature and humidity with low costs and consumption; acoustic comfort thanks to an ideal conditioning of the spaces even in conditions of intense dog-human coexistence; and quality of spaces where both humans and non-humans meet and enjoy together. 

This project is exemplary precisely in that point between careful and sophisticated design, functionality in unconventional conditions, and experience between different species. All this from an economy of resources and final design strategy, and assuming a radically different reference in relation to a sector whose standards are in many cases precarious and lack a concern for aesthetics or quality of experience.

Please give information about the key objectives of your project in terms of inclusion (equal opportunities, public participation, citizen engagement, co-design, universal design, accessibility, affordability, etc.) and how these have been met.
Please highlight how the project can be exemplary in this context

The project strongly takes into account desirable common conditions of inclusion. Even though it is a private initiative, it participates in a socially and ecologically responsible logic. In the development of the project, co-design processes have been developed with the clients and their community. But the highlights that make Educan an exemplary project in terms of inclusion have to do with ways of expanding what the term may mean today.

Educan is an environmental regeneration project that addresses inclusivity within the environment in which we live, with the conditions altered by human beings that have impoverished the biodiversity in its territory. It is important to remark that Educan is a construction with a low ecological footprint, giving importance to the life cycle of the materials of the architecture and the resources that it requires. Educan is also a space for interspecies coexistence. With this statement, the idea of ​​inclusion extends beyond humans to the world of non-humans, designing with accessibility in mind for young and old but also for dogs and birds (in relation to nest design), and beyond, taking into account new conditions for a universal design. As Donna Haraway suggests, companion species imply reciprocal relationships, and Educan has proposed putting all the non-human species that accompany the owners of the space at the center of the design. In addition, making all this visible makes Educan a pedagogical architecture.

One last approach that implies an extra condition of inclusion has to do with rur-urban mediation. Educan proposes a reactivation of rural environments close to cities, trying to value these territories in a country, Spain, in which the idea of ​​emptying the rural (Empty Spain -España Vacía-) is relevant in public debate. On the other hand, new models are proposed that allow living between the urban and the rural, displacing and distributing the human load on the territory in more sustainable ways.

Please explain how these three dimensions have been combined in your project.
Please highlight how this approach can be exemplary

Educan is designed as an ecosystemic architecture that brings together multiple approaches and perspectives of what a sustainable design can be. Developed through different scales of intervention, the building explores how architecture can be designed not only in material terms but as an habitat, contributing to re-naturalize its local context.

First of all, the building questions the subject of the user (for whom do we design as architects?), proposing re-centering it and including non-humans as the new center of all design decisions. The project focus on the relationships of all this species that cohabit, including spaces and devices specifically designed for dogs and birds (as it is also a trend in European legislation on animal welfare), which intervene in the recuperation of the natural conditions of the context.

The ecosystemic approach is also developed in material terms, introducing a circular approach to architecture. Industrial and agricultural buildings in Europe tend to have lower standards in terms of habitability, design and materiality. We believe it's important to increase them and Educan is an example of how innovation can be achieved with economy, saving material, energy and resources, and at the same time providing aesthetic quality and comfort.

In addition, the building questions the time and consequences of architecture (for how long do we design as architects?), proposing an evolutive architecture that can contribute to gradually improve its environment, but that can also in future be disassembled, reducing its environmental impact.

Please give information on the results/impacts achieved by your project in relation to the category you apply for

The project has had a great impact as an innovative building. It has been recognized with several prizes, including the 2022 EU Mies Awards Nomination, the 2021 FAD Awards (Selected), MatCOAM Awards Innovation Prize 2021 (1st Prize), the COAM Awards 2021 (Special Mention) and the Mapei Awards in Sustainable Design (3rd Prize).

All the prices received recognize the innovative approach of this building in terms of sustainable design as a multi-species and ecosystemic building, and in material terms, including the circularity of materials through innovative construction solutions.

Beside this, the project has had a great impact thought publications in newspapers (El País, Icon Design, La Vanguardia) and international architecture magazines such as Architectural Review (UK), Bauwelt (Germany), Arquitectura Viva (Spain), Frame (The Netherlands) and L'Architecture d'Aujourd'hui (France). Three of them also dedicate a monograph issue of interspecies design, with which we contribute to open sensibilities of introducing non-humans and ecosystemic approaches in the architectural debate.

Besides this panoramic approach in terms of visibility and global impact, the project is currently contributing to regenerate the local rural environment through the nesting of different species of birds. An owl, swifts, bats, kestrels and sparrows that inhabit the upper facades feed on insects (including mosquitoes that can carry certain canine diseases), and contribute to maintaining the balance in the pollination cycles of flowers and plants in the surrounding fields. This work of renaturalization of the local ecosystem is done in collaboration with Grefa (Group for the Rehabilitation of Native Fauna and its Habitat). It is also important to note that Educan is one of the most important companies in Spain in relation to the animal world (currently its CEO is part of the board of directors of the Royal Spanish Canine Society), assuming the Educan school is an exemplary milestone.

Please explain how citizens and civil society were involved in the in the design and/or implementation of the project.
Please also explain the benefits that derived from their involvement.

The project was developed together with the clients (Carlos and Eva, partners of Educan), and together with its user community. Educan is a pioneer company in dog training, but also in research on animal cognition. They have been collaborators of the Ministry of Agriculture (General Directorate of Animal Welfare), the Madrid Zoo, and they are part of the current management committee of the Royal Spanish Canine Society (Sports Directorate). They have a high scientific knowledge that has allowed key decisions to be made with them for a functionally successful design, or for a choice of materials suitable for the required uses. The process began in 2017 and numerous meetings and debates have been held with them to include all the voices of owners, teachers of the center, and students, as well as with Enrique in the initial phase of the project (he was the responsible for maintaining Educan, and a lover of ornithology), and other voices from the world of ecology and environmental care, such as the GREFA association (Group for the Rehabilitation of Native Fauna and its Habitat), who informed the project about the most suitable species for repopulation.

The community of dog lovers is socially transversal and diverse, and at the same time active and sensitive. The pedagogical condition of the building (in its environmental ethics) is experienced by the entire community of users and friends of Educan, allowing these values ​​to be spread to other contexts linked to the canine world, but also in general to other geographical and social contexts.

Please explain what kind of global challenges the project addressed by providing local solutions

This project has faced three global challenges to which a local response has been given, but with possibilities of scalability and transfer to other contexts: 

Post-anthropocene architecture: it has been designed taking into account conditions not centered (only) on the human being, but on other species that live with us and on which our action produces an impact. 

Ecosystemic architecture and territorial renaturalization: Educan has been conceived as an opportunity to recover the environmental conditions of an altered environment. The entire project has been understood as a seed that germinates over time, and that allows the recovery of local flora and fauna (birds, bats, insects, aromatic plants, local herbaceous plants, etc.), building a broader symbiotic relationship with the new inhabitants. of the territory, humans and dogs. 

Constructive innovation and circularity: the ecological footprint has been minimized, proposing the use of reused, reusable and recyclable materials, favoring local labor and resources, and generally reducing material, energy and natural resources throughout the entire construction and life process of the building.

Educan connects with UN Sustainable Development Goals, specially: 11: Make cities inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable; 12: Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns; 13: Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts; 15: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.

Please highlight the innovative character of the project as compared to mainstream practices in the field of the project.

Educan is the first award-winning dog training building, the first to obtain an A energy rating in Spain, and the first widely recognized and published in Europe. We could summarize the innovations that Educan entails in several points:

It is a building that proposes that its scope of intervention is not only its 300m2 floor plan, but an entire territory connected to the planet. For this statement, strategies are developed to recover the environmental conditions lost with agricultural intensification through the integration of new native vegetation and animal species in depopulation in the environment, especially birds. This strategy of recovering an ecosystem is perhaps the most notable innovation, that implies a pedagogical and replicable output.

It is a building designed for humans and non-humans: it integrates nests, reuses rainwater for birds and dogs, and it is designed by turning dogs in the center of the design decisions.

It is an exemplary building in terms of circular architecture ans sustainability: much of its material is reused (six obsolete shipping containers that become the roof, formwork and enclosure of the old center). In it, pre-industrialization techniques and km 0 architecture are tested, using materials and trades within a radius of 30 km.

Despite a very tight budget, the building achieves high standards of energy efficiency (insulation, bioclimatism) and an ecological water management, all with high architectural quality. This implies a great typological innovation: this type of buildings for canine uses are usually very precarious (a kind of industrial buildings). Educan shows that architecture design can achieve efficient and quality spaces with adjusted costs.

Please explain to the potential of transferring the projects’ results or learnings to other interested parties and contexts.
Please provide clear documentation, communication of methodology and principles in this context.

The projects of renaturalization and recovery of ecosystems, or those of interspecies architectures have gradually more contemporary relevance. Educan proposes both the recovery of an altered territory in a rur-urban environment, as well as the redesign of new prototypes and strategies for an interspecies architecture. Some of these tactics have been put into practice in previous contexts, but the holistic assembly of an entire material, energy, geological, water and zoological strategy, also communicated in an open and pedagogical way, can be a useful resource for other actions in similar territories. 

The strategies of circularity (material reuse), and the reduction of material and energy resources, are similar to other practices developed by the architects of Educan (for example, the FUA -Furniture Urban Alphabets- project, which recovers obsolete materials from municipal warehouses for the manufacture of furniture and public equipment). Especially the strategies for  the reuse of maritime containers have been relevant and widespread in the last 10-15 years, although in the case of Educan unprecedented proposals for the use of containers have been tested, as roofs for buildings, fragments of the same containers as formwork elements, or ventilated facade cladding for other pre-existing buildings. This set of open source strategies can also be useful for other interventions that reuse sea containers as raw materials. The reduction of the ecological footprint of the building with the reuse of a maritime container is estimated to save about 4000 kg of steel, or the CO2 equivalent to the pollution produced for the entire useful life of a standard vehicle with a gasoline engine. 

All energy saving strategies, transferable, have also made it possible to obtain the A energy rating.

Is an evaluation report or any relevant documentation available?
If you would like to upload additional documentation, please upload it or write it below

Educan is the first award-winning dog training building and the first to obtain an A energy rating in Spain (includes certificate).

By ticking this box, you declare that you are not in in one or more of the exclusion situations foreseen under Article 136 of the Financial Regulation.
By ticking this box, you declare that all the information provided in this form is factually correct, that you assume sole liability in the event of a claim relating to the activities carried out in the framework of the contest, that the proposed project has not been proposed for the New European Bauhaus Prizes 2022 in any other category or strand and that it has not been subject to any type of investigation, which could lead to a financial correction because of irregularities or fraud.
By submitting your application, you guarantee that you are the author or have the rights to proceed with the application and to authorise the use of the project, concept, idea, and that you have obtained any necessary consents, licenses or assignments from third parties and included copyright notices when necessary.
By submitting your application, you understand that all the applications that meet the eligibility requirements will be shared for the purposes of the selection processes, and notably published on the secured platform and for the purposes of the promotion of these on the New European Bauhaus website and/or other European Commission communication channels. In this sense, the applications would be widely available. Applicants should ensure that they present their ideas, concepts, projects, in such a way that they could be shared without giving rise to intellectual property related concerns. If your submission is selected as one of the finalists, it will additionally be shared for the purpose of the public vote that will take place. The European Union is granted a licence to use and share your application with the general public and the official external experts for the purposes of the selection process, including the voting. The European Union has the right to use the images and visual materials and the description provided in the application for communication purposes related to the contest and beyond. Rights granted comprise the right to store, reproduce, display, publish and communicate or distribute copies in electronic or digital format, including, but not only, through the internet. Unless you have disclosed your name, the European Commission has no obligation to share your name when using or disseminating your contribution to the public. The European Union cannot be held responsible in case any submitted idea, project, concept is found to infringe third parties rights. The European Union shall be neither responsible for the use that third parties may do of the applications or related content.


In order to submit your project, please make sure you have filled in all the mandatory fields marked with *, in both the “Basic information” and “Description of the project” tabs.


The country you have selected is not a Member State of the EU.

Please select the country your project was either implemented in the EU for strand A in or is being developed or intended to be implemented in the EU for strand B.